高碧叶;

• 1:中国社会科学院社会学研究所

摘要(Abstract)：

本文主要介绍了哈贝马斯的公共领域理论,并对女性主义者对哈贝马斯公共领域理论的批判进行了概括。文章指出,女性主义者对哈贝马斯公共领域理论的批判包括对公共领域平等参与机会、理性化特征以及公私领域界限的批判。这三条批判路径显示了女性主义者寻求特殊性政治的诉求,这与哈贝马斯寻求普遍性政治形成了一定的张力。

关键词(KeyWords)： 哈贝马斯;女性主义者;公共领域

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 高碧叶;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]哈贝马斯.公共领域的结构转型[M].上海:学林出版社,1999.
• [2] Nancy Fraser.Rethinking the public sphere:A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy,in Habermas and the Public Sphere,edited by Craig Calhoun,Massachusetts Institute of Technology,1992.
• [3] Nancy Fraser.What’s critical about critical theory?,in Feminists Read Habermas:Gendering the Subject of Discourse,edited by Johanna Meehan,Routledge:New York and London,1995.
• [4] Marie Fleming.Women and the “Public Use of Reason”,in Feminists Read Habermas:Gendering the Subject of Discourse,edited by Johanna Meehan,Routledge:New York and London,1995.
• [5]中共中央编译局.马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
• [6]南希·弗雷泽.正义的中断[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2009.
• [7] Joan B.Landes.The Public and the Private Sphere:A Feminist Reconsideration,in Feminists Read Habermas:Gendering the Subject of Discourse,edited by Johanna Meehan,p107,Routledge:New York and London,1995.
• [8] Iris Marion Young.Inclusion and democracy,Oxford University Press,2000.
• [9] Mary P.Ryan.Gender and Public Access:Women’s Politics in Nineteenth-Century America,in Habermas and the Public Sphere,edited by Craig Calhoun,Massachusetts Institute of Technology,1992.
• [10]Jane Braaten.From Communicative Rationality to Communicative Thinking:A Basis for Feminist Theory and Practice,in Feminists Read Habermas:Gendering the Subject of Discourse,edited by Johanna Meehan,Routledge:New York and London,1995.
• [11]Seyla Benhabib.Situating the Self,New York:Routledge,1992.
• [12]Carole Pateman.“Feminist Critiques of Public/Private Dichotomy”,in Public and Private in Social Life,edited by Stanley I.Benn,G.F.Gaus,St.Martin's Press & Croom Helm,1983.

文章评论(Comment)：